COMPARE

Aduno vs Celigo

Celigo works for general SaaS integration — but B2B and EDI are a different challenge. If per-partner pricing, add-on B2B modules, and manual flow building are slowing you down, here is how Aduno compares.

Get started with Aduno Talk to sales

Feature by feature

A direct comparison of where the platforms differ for B2B and EDI use cases.

Feature	Celigo	Aduno
Setup time	Days to weeks — requires iPaaS expertise	Hours — describe your integration conversationally
Pricing model	Per trading partner + per document type	Per document, predictable — add partners without repricing
EDI support	B2B Manager add-on, not included by default	Native EDI translation — X12, EDIFACT, and more
Field mapping	Manual flow builder — custom logic requires scripting	AI-generated JSONata, auto-verified — no scripting needed
Learning curve	Steep for custom or complex integrations	Conversational — no iPaaS expertise required
Error handling	Complex troubleshooting across flow steps	AI-assisted error resolution with plain-language explanations

Why teams switch to Aduno

The most common reasons teams look beyond Celigo for B2B integration.

No per-partner pricing

Celigo's per-trading-partner model means every new B2B connection adds to your bill. Aduno prices per document — your costs scale with volume, not with the number of relationships you manage.

AI replaces manual flow building

Building a Celigo integration means dragging flows together and writing transformation scripts. In Aduno, the AI agent builds the mapping from your spec — you review, approve, and go live.

Purpose-built for B2B, not retrofitted

Celigo started as a general iPaaS and added B2B capabilities over time. Aduno was designed from the ground up for EDI translation, multi-tenant B2B workflows, and AS2/SFTP/Peppol delivery.

Ready to move past Celigo?

Purpose-built for B2B — not a general iPaaS that added EDI later. See how fast you can go live.

Start for free Talk to sales